Send a workflow.
Get a written audit in 48 hours. Free.

Free async audit for founders, agency owners, and ops leads. Send a Loom or short brief, and you'll get back a one-page written response within 48 hours: the three highest-leverage automations in the workflow, where to start, what to skip, rough cost and timeline. No sales call attached.

01.

Send the workflow

Send a five-minute Loom walking through one workflow, or a short written brief if recording is friction. Include the current stack and the part that costs the most time.

02.

I write the audit

A one-page written response inside 48 hours: the three highest-leverage automations ranked, stack-specific recommendations, what not to automate, and rough cost and ship-time estimates.

03.

You decide what's next

If one of the three is worth shipping and the fit is right, the natural next step is the paid Audit or a Sprint. Or you take the written audit and build it yourself. Both are valid uses of the format.

async audit · 5 fields · ~5 minutes to send

Send your workflow.

The form below submits directly to my inbox. I read every submission personally and reply within 48 hours on weekdays. There is no follow-up sequence, no mailing list signup, and no automated sales outreach attached to the audit.

48-hour reply window. Toronto / ET. No spam, no list, no sales sequence.
qualifier · who this is for

Best fit for these four buyer types.

If you do not match one of these, the written audit will probably not produce the kind of recommendation that's worth shipping. Read before sending.

GOOD FIT

SaaS founder, 1-15 people

The team is running operations manually that the product itself should be automating. The opportunity is visible, but there is no internal engineer with the capacity to ship the automation.

GOOD FIT

Agency owner, under 10 people

A specific workflow is consuming client-delivery margin. Common cases: client reporting, content production, lead enrichment, QA review pipelines.

GOOD FIT

Tech-forward SMB

The business is already running on a modern stack (Vercel, Supabase, or equivalent) rather than relying primarily on no-code platforms. The workflow is a candidate for owned code rather than an additional Zapier dependency.

GOOD FIT

Ops lead inside a Series A/B company

The engineering team is committed to product work. You own the operations stack and want an external written assessment before proposing the build internally.

NOT A FIT

Pre-revenue solo founder

At pre-revenue stage, the audit recommendation is almost always to focus on shipping the product before investing in operations automation. Review the engagement shapes at /services/ to understand the timing better.

NOT A FIT

50+ person organization with internal engineering

A one-page external audit cannot represent the full surface area of an organization at that size. The internal engineering team is better positioned to scope and own the work directly.

NOT A FIT

"Broken Zapier" repair work

The audit recommends code-first rebuilds rather than fixes to existing no-code platforms. If the workflow only makes sense on Zapier and the priority is to keep it there, the engagement is not the right match.

NOT A FIT

Marketing strategy audit

The format is an operations and workflow audit. It does not cover positioning, copywriting, brand strategy, or paid-advertising review. Those are different engagements that require different specialists.

ALTERNATIVE

Already know you want to scope a build?

If the engagement shape is already clear, the free 30-minute scoping call is the faster path to a written quote.