For founders, agency owners, and ops leads. Send a Loom or a short brief of one workflow. You get a one-page written response inside 48 hours: the three highest-impact automations ranked, where to start, what to skip, and rough cost and timeline. Free, and the reply is written, not a call.
A five-minute Loom walking through one workflow, or a short written brief. Include your current stack and the step that costs the most time.
One page: the three automations ranked, what to build first, what to leave alone, and the cost and ship-time for each.
If one of the three is worth shipping, the next step is a $750 Pilot Build or a Sprint. Or you take the written audit and build it yourself. Both work.
To size the problem in numbers first, use the Speed-to-Lead calculator →
This form goes straight to my inbox.
The audit works when there is a live workflow to look at.
Leads arrive from ads and search, and follow-up is manual. The audit maps where response time and hand-offs are losing bookings, the same shape as the Orbit build.
The team runs operations by hand that the product should automate. The opportunity is clear, but no engineer has capacity to ship it.
A specific workflow is consuming client-delivery margin. Common cases: client reporting, content production, lead enrichment, QA review pipelines.
The business already runs on a modern stack (Vercel, Supabase, or similar), not no-code platforms. The workflow suits owned code, not another Zapier dependency.
Engineering is heads-down on product. You own the ops stack and want an outside read before you propose the build internally.
Not a fit: pre-revenue ideas without a live workflow, 50+ person orgs with internal engineering, no-code repair work, and marketing-strategy reviews. Those need different help, and the reply will say so.